Since last night, many digital currency trading platforms have suddenly become inaccessible and unusable, which is definitely a hot spot in the currency circle and something that has been expected for a long time. This is another large-scale rectification and blocking after the WeChat official account of the digital currency trading platform was blocked in batches a few days ago.
This time it is inaccessible, from the analysis of DNS resolution and routing tracking data, this blocking is not like DNS hijacking or DNS pollution, it is basically a blocking blacklist to deal with, indicating that our competent regulatory authorities have further vigorously cracked down on digital currency transactions, and have sorted out the list, at least the digital currency trading platform on the ranking should be handed over to the counterpart management department for processing. Further observation shows that when users access the data of these trading platforms and request some routes of the backbone nodes, similar requests will be abandoned, resulting in timeout and inaccessibility, which is no different from Facebook and Twitter. Therefore, the IP of the main trading platform is almost ironclad to be blacklisted, the digital currency trading platform will be unified on the duplicate mainstream digital currency, so it is more keen to engage in rankings, and there are also many market information websites in the transfer to do the summary ranking, this time, even the homework does not have to do too much, there is a ready-made list to take to block, as of the time of writing this article, whether it is deployed in North America or Asia-Pacific or Europe, most platforms are not spared, Judging from the current signals released by the official regulatory authorities and the recent relevant financial market regulatory styles, there is basically no room for negotiation, so we can also foresee that there may be a stronger wave in the future this blocking, involving more mainstream large platforms, targeting more newly discovered platform server IPs, various types of App applications, verifying SMS interfaces, verifying emails, domain name resolution, etc., to carry out all-round crackdowns and bans.
For a while, there was a lot of discussion in the market, and people from different backgrounds and different cognitive fields were abusive, some sarcastic, some complained, and some quarreled. As a member of the currency circle, I have received a large amount of information in the Telegram and WeChat groups of several trading platforms, all of which focus on the inaccessibility of this matter, which platform is no longer good, which platform has been restored, some people and executives on major platforms have also come out to speak, public relations, and some are taking the opportunity to provide scientific Internet charging business, and some are worried and seeking batch offline transfers. In terms of the three mainstream platforms, according to the current preliminary tests, platform B may not be able to be used normally, platform O and platform H may have been temporarily restored, and some of the articles or other functional sections of blocked domain names are more or less problematic, and the overall speed is not very good, and it is estimated that other backup nodes and lines may have been switched. At this time, the currency circle began to quarrel again, why others can, why can't you, why other platforms are normal, but your own platform cannot be used. In fact, both parties are right. The timely technical adjustment of the O platform and the H platform is to give users a buffer, and suddenly they cannot be accessed, which will cause panic and dissatisfaction to many users, and will cause various rumors, and it is also a good time to grab customers. Why do the author think it is a buffer, because no matter how you adjust the plan, you will never be able to escape the ban again sooner or later, and it is basically impossible to use it normally. As the first batch of platforms to carry out overseas layout and development, and the first batch of platforms to shield and protect their own web, we can observe the tendency of the management of platform B, and platform B is very good at figuring out and familiar with the attitude of the management department. If you still do it at this time, it will definitely cause greater dissatisfaction with the management department. Platform B wants to take care of users, and there are emotional factors, but in terms of decision-making, they would rather take 10,000 steps back than make a head, but platform B does not make technical adjustments to temporarily restore services, which may also lead to users who are already dissatisfied with voting with their feet, resulting in user loss and a further decline in brand favorability.
What to do next, what will happen, and how the policy will go are probably the answers that many people want to ask. From the perspective of national financial policy, unofficial digital currency will definitely impact the current monetary system, not only the exchange rate, but also the domestic money supply system, causing chaos in the financial order, and many token projects will also cause social instability, which is already a fact, and the state must take care of it. But peers who study digital currencies in depth should also know that this is really difficult to manage. The business of C2C over-the-counter trading alone is basically difficult to manage. For example, two people transfer 10,000 yuan privately, how do you know whether it is used to buy iphoneX, or to repay the loan, or for transactions, although a network system has been established at present, but this daily data flow is too large and scattered to effectively track. Therefore, for example, it is difficult to interrupt payment channels and cut off account connectivity. Because in fact, these two account systems, one is traditional finance, the cash deposit account system, the other is the digital wallet system, which is originally a system, each has its own channel, there is no channel connection between the two systems, where is the need for payment channels, where there is a cut off, so it is more difficult to supervise, but from the perspective of national policy, maintaining financial order, and maintaining social stability, the large trading platforms that provide services will basically be blocked. It will reduce the contribution of domestic transactions to a certain extent, but it will not have much impact on the world, and people with transaction needs will always find a way. Blocking the big platform is the first step, and if there are still big platforms that continue to make waves, it is estimated that there will be further action. After the large platform is blocked, it will begin to deal with small and medium-sized platforms, but for small and medium-sized platforms, will there be another special cleanup and rectification, this will be based on the loss caused to the social population by the project, covering the number of people affected, etc. and different investment intensity, if the follow-up small and medium-sized platforms cooperate with the air project to carry out a large-scale copycat circle of money to cause too many rights protection petitions, it is still possible to concentrate on cleaning up and cracking down, but it is difficult to crack down on these small and medium-sized platforms all, just like there was a foreign exchange trading platform in China more than ten or twenty years ago, and there are still there. Underground quiz platforms have also been cracking down, or there has always been the same reason, knocking down one, coming out of a bunch, but it will still be the main regulatory target, from the perspective of maintaining the current stage of financial order and social stability, it is right and foreseeable.
To sum up, it can be expected that for the platform side, the big platform continues to be a big platform, the transaction will shrink, but it is also not a big impact, anyway, there is already a certain amount of precipitation users and not bad money, continue to hang for faith or continue to make more money, there is always trading volume, at present, it seems that digital currency trading is a global market, the domestic market is gone, and the overseas is still a big good. Small platform, small fights, constant fighting, and new ones. As a user, the transaction will definitely continue, and more convenient new channels may be derived to meet the transaction. As a policymaker, of course, we will continue to vigorously crack down on the investigation and punishment of digital currency trading platforms, and will launch our country's official digital currency in a timely manner, until the policy environment allows, foreign exchange controls are gradually liberalized, and it is estimated that there may be a major change in direction. Finally, the author will talk about some irrational and non-academic wild views: for digital currency, it is actually a new international currency, when no one recognizes it, it is zero, if someone is willing to exchange it with other currencies, it has value, in fact, there is not much difference from the euro after the establishment of the European Union, for the financial order of various countries at this stage, it is definitely not allowed, but it is difficult to completely abandon it, because digital currency cannot be controlled by a certain institution such as the Federal Reserve, constant quantity and many other advantages, It is the basis for human beings to achieve cross-regional barrier-free trade and the optimal cooperative allocation of output for all mankind in the future, and it is absolutely possible to replace the status of gold and the dollar. But these have little to do with whether a specific digital currency can rise or fall. The current price of a specific digital currency still reflects the willingness of how many users of the digital currency are willing to exchange with traditional currency, and reflects the judgment of some regions and groups of people on its value. Some friends say that holding a digital currency is risk-free and always preserves its value, which is not very responsible, but relatively speaking, some digital currencies are more stable and more valuable than other digital currencies, which is correct. But no matter what, at this stage, due to the lack of management of authorities, coupled with the participation of various forces, the volatility will continue to be intense, until a certain or several digital currencies form a global consensus, which will definitely make it form a stable value, which will be reflected in the price. By that time, it means that the benchmark digital currency has achieved the status of the only international settlement currency, which represents the purchasing power or labor output value of a certain unit without difference, and it has been separated from being a specific digital currency symbol, but represents the unit of measurement of the output capacity of an individual, organization, institution and other subjects, and is used as a medium for the holding, exchange and consumption of output returns in human society. Finally, finally, finally, it is still the same sentence, supervision is necessary, the future is bright, the risks are huge, and the trend is irreversible.
|