WPS vs Office Comparison!
Take word2003 and wps text 2003 as examples:
1. Insert a table in the text
When inserting a table, the slash header is almost a must! In this regard, I think WPS2003 is much superior to word2003.
1.1. Word2003 draws slash headers
When drawing the slash header in word2003, the software will let you choose how many columns, what content to enter in each column, and how many words to use, which seems very thoughtful! When there are few columns, such as two columns, it is still convenient; But if there are more than three columns, it's troublesome: when you enter the content of each column and set the font size, it will prompt you that the font size is too large to display. The following is to break up the watch header and move it one by one until it fits! It's troublesome! I believe that anyone who has used it will encounter this situation.
1.2. WPS2003 draws the slash header
When wps2003 draws the slash header, the software only allows you to choose a few columns, as for what content to enter in each column, use a few words, you can set it according to your needs when entering the content, and it is very convenient to make a beautiful header. I didn't give an example because those who have used these two software will find this difference.
2. When it is necessary to insert values with tolerances in the text, word2003 is better than wps2003
2.1. Word2003 inserts values with tolerances, and uses format-Chinese layout-double-line integration, and you can enter values with tolerances that fully meet the standards.
2.2. When WPS2003 inserts the values with tolerance, it is completed with superscript and subscript, and there will be some misalignment between the upper and lower tolerances.
3. Compared with excel and wps tables, the former has many more function types than the latter.
Not finished
4. Compatibility of WPS2003, WPS2012 text with Word2003
4.1. The compatibility of wps2003 text with word2003 is very poor, which is a pain for me! My colleague uses WPS2003 to write files, and sometimes needs to convert them into word format files when they need to pass electronic documents to customers, which really hurts me, and saves the WPS format file as word format, and the result is a mess, and it needs to be reformatted. A prominent problem with tables in the file is that the slash header, which is beautiful in WPS, is missing and needs to be redrawn.
4.2. The compatibility of wps2012 text with word2003 is better: wps2012 can directly open the word format file, which can basically be opened as it is, which is good; WPS2012 text to open the WPS2003 version of the file, the effect is not good, that is to say, use WPS2012 to open the lower version of the WPS file, and then convert it to word format, the effect is not good!
4.3. WPS2012 is almost the same as the menu of Word, giving me the feeling that the difference between them is the difference in name! It makes colleagues who are used to using WPS2003 extremely uncomfortable!
4.4. When it comes to compatibility, Microsoft is the hegemon, so naturally it will not take the initiative to be compatible with WPS; WPS is actively compatible with Office, and even to the point where it is moving step by step, I am really worried about WPS.
5. Many menus of WPS2003 can be displayed in the window after opening once, as long as you do not close them, such as symbols; Word2003 cannot be implemented, and when a caret is needed, it needs to be opened one by one through the menu every time.
6. The size of the WPS format file and the word format file
The same file, the WPS format file is smaller than the Word format file, which is a small pride for WPS lovers.
7. Use WPS2012 to open a higher version of OFFICE files
At work, customers often send some high-level office files, which cannot be opened with office2003, but can be opened with WPS2012, which can be regarded as a small contribution of WPS2012.
8. WPS2012 the effect of opening WPS2003 files is not good!
My colleague uses WPS2003 and has a large number of documents compiled in WPS2003 script. When opening with WPS2012 text, the page will turn black, it doesn't matter, just set the color; The key is that the typography becomes messy, if it is a table, it is not fully displayed, and there are many tables, but only one or two tables are displayed.
|
Posted on 1/4/2015 5:18:04 PM
|
|
|
